I’d?
-
- Barbel
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: Sun Apr 14 2019 08:14
Re: I’d?
suffolk si wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 16:41 -Not a chance I think Si sadly.Fairly confident it’s a barbel tbh
I don't care who your dad is , you're not walking across the river when I'm fishing!
-
- Barbel
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: Sun Apr 14 2019 08:14
Re: I’d?
Luke wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 17:24 -The dorsal is completely wrong for a barbel Luke.It does look very much like a barbel but I can't help thinking the dorsal fin is just a little too far back.
Obviously tricky to tell with that angle though.
This is becoming quite comical tbh. I won’t say where it was taken but it has more chance of being a unicorn than a barbel tbh.
Great to see that other people’s fish id skills are as questionable as mine though.
I don't care who your dad is , you're not walking across the river when I'm fishing!
- Cyprio
- Chub
- Posts: 2498
- Joined: Sat Oct 24 2015 22:02
- Location: Suffolk
Re: I’d?
How about a Chub.
Would/could have same orange tinge to fin.
The fish is obviously turning away to avoid retina burn
The nose area anomaly could just be flotsam/debris/weed.
Plus they don’t mind living in the smallest of ditches even fish of size
Would/could have same orange tinge to fin.
The fish is obviously turning away to avoid retina burn
The nose area anomaly could just be flotsam/debris/weed.
Plus they don’t mind living in the smallest of ditches even fish of size
Andy Carpenter
-
- Barbel
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: Sun Apr 14 2019 08:14
Re: I’d?
davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 17:47 -Appalling photo?The angle is deceptive and the photo is appalling. I'm leaning away from barbel now to something else beginning with 'B'...
...Basking Shark.
Of course Dave. There has to be some reason you made the same call as me!
I don't care who your dad is , you're not walking across the river when I'm fishing!
- davelumb
- Forum Sponsor
- Posts: 42693
- Joined: Sat Aug 27 2011 05:00
- Location: On some faraway beach
- Contact:
Re: I’d?
Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:07 -It's one of those things that the more you look the more you doubt your original impression! I tried to judge the position of the dorsal fin relative to the belly fins but couldn't make my mind up. Could be a bream, could be a barbel. We'll never know. Because even if a bream IS caught there could still be a barbel that's uncaught!
-
- Barbel
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: Sun Apr 14 2019 08:14
Re: I’d?
davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:11 -Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:07 -It's one of those things that the more you look the more you doubt your original impression! I tried to judge the position of the dorsal fin relative to the belly fins but couldn't make my mind up. Could be a bream, could be a barbel. We'll never know. Because even if a bream IS caught there could still be a barbel that's uncaught!davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 17:47 -Appalling photo?The angle is deceptive and the photo is appalling. I'm leaning away from barbel now to something else beginning with 'B'...
If anybody else had told me I’d still be undecided, but I know the fella in question will be correct.
Unlike us reprobates this fella actually spends his life fishing, not arguing the toss about tosh on a ‘fishing’ forum.
It’s a bream. That’s it.
...Basking Shark.
Of course Dave. There has to be some reason you made the same call as me!
I don't care who your dad is , you're not walking across the river when I'm fishing!
-
- Barbel
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: Sun Apr 14 2019 08:14
Re: I’d?
davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:11 -If anybody else had told me I’d still be undecided, but I know the fella in question will be correct.Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:07 -It's one of those things that the more you look the more you doubt your original impression! I tried to judge the position of the dorsal fin relative to the belly fins but couldn't make my mind up. Could be a bream, could be a barbel. We'll never know. Because even if a bream IS caught there could still be a barbel that's uncaught!
Unlike us reprobates this fella actually spends his life fishing, not arguing the toss about tosh on a ‘fishing’ forum.
It’s a bream. That’s it.
I don't care who your dad is , you're not walking across the river when I'm fishing!
- Bob Watson
- Zander
- Posts: 8104
- Joined: Sun Aug 28 2011 05:00
- Location: Stockton on Redacted
Re: I’d?
suffolk si wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 16:41 -+1Fairly confident it’s a barbel tbh
- davelumb
- Forum Sponsor
- Posts: 42693
- Joined: Sat Aug 27 2011 05:00
- Location: On some faraway beach
- Contact:
Re: I’d?
Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:33 -It would have been better if he'd not taken a photo. Would have saved a load of wasted time for us armchair anglers!davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:11 -If anybody else had told me I’d still be undecided, but I know the fella in question will be correct.Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:07 -It's one of those things that the more you look the more you doubt your original impression! I tried to judge the position of the dorsal fin relative to the belly fins but couldn't make my mind up. Could be a bream, could be a barbel. We'll never know. Because even if a bream IS caught there could still be a barbel that's uncaught!
Unlike us reprobates this fella actually spends his life fishing, not arguing the toss about tosh on a ‘fishing’ forum.
It’s a bream. That’s it.
-
- Barbel
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: Sun Apr 14 2019 08:14
Re: I’d?
davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:38 -Yep, I should have known better than to ask on here, but tbh it’s quite comical seeing people trying to justify their lack of knowledge.Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:33 -It would have been better if he'd not taken a photo. Would have saved a load of wasted time for us armchair anglers!davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:11 -If anybody else had told me I’d still be undecided, but I know the fella in question will be correct.Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:07 -It's one of those things that the more you look the more you doubt your original impression! I tried to judge the position of the dorsal fin relative to the belly fins but couldn't make my mind up. Could be a bream, could be a barbel. We'll never know. Because even if a bream IS caught there could still be a barbel that's uncaught!
Unlike us reprobates this fella actually spends his life fishing, not arguing the toss about tosh on a ‘fishing’ forum.
It’s a bream. That’s it.
I don't care who your dad is , you're not walking across the river when I'm fishing!
-
- Barbel
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: Sun Apr 14 2019 08:14
Re: I’d?
davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:38 -BTW ‘He’ didn’t take the photo, it was a non fishing pal of mine that walks his dog along this stretch and knew that I’d be interested.Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:33 -It would have been better if he'd not taken a photo. Would have saved a load of wasted time for us armchair anglers!davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:11 -If anybody else had told me I’d still be undecided, but I know the fella in question will be correct.Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:07 -It's one of those things that the more you look the more you doubt your original impression! I tried to judge the position of the dorsal fin relative to the belly fins but couldn't make my mind up. Could be a bream, could be a barbel. We'll never know. Because even if a bream IS caught there could still be a barbel that's uncaught!
Unlike us reprobates this fella actually spends his life fishing, not arguing the toss about tosh on a ‘fishing’ forum.
It’s a bream. That’s it.
It’s made for some typical Pit nonsense though, so not entirely unfruitful.
I don't care who your dad is , you're not walking across the river when I'm fishing!
- davelumb
- Forum Sponsor
- Posts: 42693
- Joined: Sat Aug 27 2011 05:00
- Location: On some faraway beach
- Contact:
Re: I’d?
Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 19:03 -davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:38 -BTW ‘He’ didn’t take the photo, it was a non fishing pal of mine that walks his dog along this stretch and knew that I’d be interested.Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:33 -It would have been better if he'd not taken a photo. Would have saved a load of wasted time for us armchair anglers!davelumb wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:11 -If anybody else had told me I’d still be undecided, but I know the fella in question will be correct.Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 18:07 -It's one of those things that the more you look the more you doubt your original impression! I tried to judge the position of the dorsal fin relative to the belly fins but couldn't make my mind up. Could be a bream, could be a barbel. We'll never know. Because even if a bream IS caught there could still be a barbel that's uncaught!
Unlike us reprobates this fella actually spends his life fishing, not arguing the toss about tosh on a ‘fishing’ forum.
It’s a bream. That’s it.
It’s made for some typical Pit nonsense though, so not entirely unfruitful.
-
- Zander
- Posts: 8014
- Joined: Thu Jul 03 2014 23:41
- Location: broadland
Re: I’d?
Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 17:37 -Shame Chris, I’d say bream thensuffolk si wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 16:41 -Not a chance I think Si sadly.Fairly confident it’s a barbel tbh
-
- Barbel
- Posts: 4183
- Joined: Sun Apr 14 2019 08:14
Re: I’d?
suffolk si wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 21:02 -I’m pretty confident Si.Chris Hammond wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 17:37 -Shame Chris, I’d say bream thensuffolk si wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02 2023 16:41 -Not a chance I think Si sadly.Fairly confident it’s a barbel tbh
On the plus side it might provide an overlooked stretch where a big pike might be living.
I don't care who your dad is , you're not walking across the river when I'm fishing!
-
- Ferox Trout
- Posts: 10024
- Joined: Tue Nov 06 2012 06:00
- Location: Cambs
Re: I’d?
No its still a bream!
Cheers, Alan
Cheers, Alan
"Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity" Seneca, some Roman chap.